My primary concern with all current EV's & the new systems on the horizon like the E-Cat are their accessibility to possible outside controls? Want people locked down, send a signal by the 5g networks or something similar. Poof, all transportation/E-Cat is shut down in whatever areas, for whatever reason THEY want? Next the battery size/weight on all current EV's dies at near the same interval as is being quoted as say the E-Cat, that is a Big chunk of funds to drop on EV you can barely get rid of at those intervals?
I get your point. The concern isn’t about whether the E-Cat works, but whether outside systems could disable it. From what’s been shared so far, the E-Cat is a standalone energy device. It produces power locally and doesn’t depend on external grid or network control to operate. That makes it harder to “switch off remotely” in the way you’re describing. Of course, how it’s integrated into EVs will matter, but its design principle is decentralization. I hope that helps. Thanks
My primary concern with all current EV's & the new systems on the horizon like the E-Cat are their accessibility to possible outside controls? Want people locked down, send a signal by the 5g networks or something similar. Poof, all transportation/E-Cat is shut down in whatever areas, for whatever reason THEY want? Next the battery size/weight on all current EV's dies at near the same interval as is being quoted as say the E-Cat, that is a Big chunk of funds to drop on EV you can barely get rid of at those intervals?
I get your point. The concern isn’t about whether the E-Cat works, but whether outside systems could disable it. From what’s been shared so far, the E-Cat is a standalone energy device. It produces power locally and doesn’t depend on external grid or network control to operate. That makes it harder to “switch off remotely” in the way you’re describing. Of course, how it’s integrated into EVs will matter, but its design principle is decentralization. I hope that helps. Thanks