LENR Gaining Traction: Prometheus Breakthrough in Transforming Seawater into Green Hydrogen

Revolutionary Italian Technology in LENR is Poised to Disrupt the Global Energy Landscape with Zero-Carbon Hydrogen Production

Intro

The quest for clean, abundant energy has driven scientific innovation for decades. Among the most intriguing developments in this field is the emergence of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) technology, which is now gaining renewed attention from researchers, investors, and industry leaders worldwide. At the forefront of this resurgence stands Prometheus S.p.A., an Italian company whose revolutionary reactor promises to transform seawater into green hydrogen using a fraction of the energy required by conventional methods.

This article explores the Prometheus LENR reactor, its scientific foundations, recent developments, and potential implications for the global energy landscape. By examining the technology's promise and challenges, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of Prometheus and how its LENR Tech fits into the New Clean Energy world.

As we navigate the complex intersection of cutting-edge science, industrial application, and environmental necessity, the Prometheus story offers a compelling case study in how controversial scientific concepts can evolve from skepticism to potential commercial viability. Whether this technology will fulfill its ambitious promises remains to be seen, but the journey provides valuable insights into the evolving landscape of clean energy innovation.

Scientific Background of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)

Historical Context of LENR/Cold Fusion

The concept of nuclear fusion occurring at or near room temperature, now commonly referred to as Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR), has a complex and controversial history spanning several decades. While the term "cold fusion" gained widespread attention in 1989, the roots of the underlying concept date back to the early 20th century.

Early Investigations (1920s-1980s)

The ability of certain metals, particularly palladium, to absorb hydrogen was recognized as early as the nineteenth century by Thomas Graham. This property would later become central to cold fusion research. In the late 1920s, Austrian scientists Friedrich Paneth and Kurt Peters initially reported the transformation of hydrogen into helium through what they described as nuclear catalysis when hydrogen was absorbed by finely divided palladium at room temperature. However, they later retracted this claim, acknowledging that the helium they detected was likely atmospheric contamination.

In 1927, Swedish scientist John Tandberg reported fusion of hydrogen into helium in an electrolytic cell with palladium electrodes and applied for a patent for "a method to produce helium and useful reaction energy." His patent was denied due to his inability to explain the physical process and the recent retraction by Paneth and Peters. After the discovery of deuterium (heavy hydrogen) in 1932, Tandberg continued his experiments with heavy water, conducting work remarkably similar to what would later be attempted by Fleischmann and Pons.

The term "cold fusion" itself was first used in scientific literature as early as 1956 about muon-catalyzed fusion, a distinct but related phenomenon. In the 1980s, researchers like Paul Palmer and Steven Jones of Brigham Young University used the term in investigations of potential fusion processes occurring in planetary cores, which they termed "geo-fusion."

The Fleischmann-Pons Announcement (1989)

The watershed moment for cold fusion came in March 1989, when electrochemists Martin Fleischmann of the University of Southampton and Stanley Pons of the University of Utah announced they had achieved nuclear fusion at room temperature. Their experimental setup involved electrolysis of heavy water (D₂O) using a palladium cathode within a calorimeter designed to measure process heat.

Fleischmann and Pons hypothesized that the high compression ratio and mobility of deuterium achieved within the palladium metal during electrolysis might result in nuclear fusion. They reported observing anomalous heat production ("excess heat") that they claimed could only be explained by nuclear processes. They also reported detecting small amounts of nuclear reaction byproducts, including neutrons and tritium.

The announcement generated immense excitement and media attention worldwide, as it suggested the possibility of a clean, abundant, and inexpensive energy source. However, the scientific community quickly became divided over the validity of these claims.

Scientific Controversy and Aftermath (1989-1990s)

Following the Fleischmann-Pons announcement, numerous laboratories worldwide attempted to replicate their results. Most of these attempts failed to produce the reported excess heat or nuclear byproducts. The controversy intensified when methodological flaws and experimental errors were identified in the original study, and several initially positive replications were later retracted.

By late 1989, most mainstream scientists considered cold fusion claims discredited. The United States Department of Energy (DOE) conducted a review that concluded the reported results did not present convincing evidence of a useful energy source and decided against allocating specific funding for cold fusion research. Cold fusion gained a reputation as "pathological science" in much of the scientific community.

Continued Research and Rebranding (1990s-Present)

Despite the mainstream rejection, a small but persistent community of researchers continued to investigate the phenomenon. To distance their work from the stigma associated with "cold fusion," many researchers adopted alternative terminology such as "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions" (LENR) or "Condensed Matter Nuclear Science" (CMNS).

In 2004, the DOE conducted a second review of cold fusion research, examining new evidence presented by advocates. While this review acknowledged some unexplained results warranting further investigation, it reached similar conclusions to the 1989 review and did not result in dedicated DOE funding.

In recent years, there has been some renewed interest in the field. In 2019, Google funded a multi-year research program investigating cold fusion claims, the results of which were published in Nature. While this effort did not confirm the existence of cold fusion, it highlighted the potential value of revisiting controversial areas of science with modern techniques and open minds.

Scientific Principles Behind LENR

Conventional Nuclear Fusion vs. LENR

Conventional nuclear fusion, often called "hot fusion," occurs when atomic nuclei come together to form a heavier nucleus, releasing energy in the process. This typically requires overcoming the electrostatic repulsion between positively charged nuclei, which necessitates extremely high temperatures (millions of degrees) and pressures, such as those found in stars or created in tokamak fusion reactors.

LENR, by contrast, purportedly achieves nuclear reactions at or near room temperature through different mechanisms. While conventional fusion primarily focuses on deuterium-deuterium or deuterium-tritium reactions in plasma states, LENR typically involves metal lattices (particularly palladium, nickel, or titanium) loaded with hydrogen or deuterium.

Proposed Mechanisms

Multiple theoretical frameworks have been proposed to explain how LENR might occur, though none have achieved widespread acceptance in the mainstream scientific community:

• Lattice Confinement Fusion: This theory suggests that metal lattices can confine hydrogen isotopes at high densities, potentially enabling quantum tunneling through the Coulomb barrier that normally prevents fusion at low temperatures.

• Electron Screening: Some theories propose that electrons in the metal lattice might screen the positive charges of nuclei, reducing the repulsive forces and facilitating fusion.

• Quantum Nuclear Effects: Various quantum mechanical effects have been proposed, including the formation of coherent structures that might facilitate nuclear reactions under specific conditions.

• Widom-Larsen Theory: This more recent theory suggests that surface plasmons in metallic hydrides can facilitate the creation of "ultra-low momentum neutrons" that can be captured by nearby nuclei, initiating nuclear transmutations without requiring high-energy collisions.

Experimental Approaches

LENR experiments typically fall into several categories:

• Electrochemical Cells: Following the Fleischmann-Pons approach, these involve electrolysis of heavy water using palladium cathodes, measuring for excess heat and nuclear byproducts.

• Gas-Loading Experiments: These involve loading metal lattices (often nickel or palladium) with hydrogen or deuterium gas under specific pressure and temperature conditions.

• Plasma Electrolysis: A variation involving electrolysis at higher voltages, creating plasma conditions near the electrodes.

• Acoustic Cavitation: Some experiments use ultrasonic waves to create cavitation bubbles in deuterated liquids, potentially creating localized high-temperature and high-pressure conditions.

The primary measurements in these experiments typically include:

• Excess heat production beyond what chemical reactions could explain

• Detection of nuclear byproducts (neutrons, tritium, helium, or transmutation products)

• Changes in isotopic ratios of elements in the experimental apparatus

Comparison with Traditional Hydrogen Production Methods

Conventional Hydrogen Production

Traditional methods of hydrogen production include:

• Steam Methane Reforming (SMR): Currently, the dominant industrial process, accounting for approximately 95% of hydrogen production. Natural gas reacts with steam at high temperatures (700-1000°C) in the presence of a catalyst to produce hydrogen and carbon dioxide. While efficient, this process is carbon-intensive.

• Electrolysis: Conventional electrolysis splits water into hydrogen and oxygen using electricity. While this can be carbon-neutral if powered by renewable energy (producing "green hydrogen"), it is currently more expensive than SMR and requires significant electrical input.

• Coal Gasification: Coal reacts with oxygen and steam under high pressures and temperatures to form syngas, which is then processed to separate hydrogen. This method has high carbon emissions.

• Biomass Gasification: Similar to coal gasification but using organic materials, resulting in lower net carbon emissions.

LENR-Based Hydrogen Production (Prometheus Approach)

The Prometheus reactor, according to company claims, represents a fundamentally different approach to hydrogen production:

1. Energy Input: Unlike conventional electrolysis, which requires substantial electrical input proportional to hydrogen output, the Prometheus system reportedly uses minimal electrical input (comparable to a car battery) to initiate and sustain the reaction.

2. Process Mechanism: Rather than splitting water molecules through electrolysis, the Prometheus reactor allegedly initiates a Low Energy Nuclear Reaction that generates a pressure wave and produces hydrogen as a byproduct.

3. Resource Requirements: Conventional electrolysis requires high-purity water and often uses precious metal catalysts. The Prometheus system claims to work with ordinary seawater and does not require rare materials beyond the metal electrodes that need periodic replacement.

4. Infrastructure Needs: Traditional hydrogen production methods often require extensive infrastructure for production, storage, and transportation. The Prometheus reactor is described as compact (reportedly "no larger than a coffee maker") and potentially suitable for distributed, on-demand hydrogen generation.

5. Environmental Impact: While green hydrogen from renewable-powered electrolysis is carbon-neutral, the energy requirements are substantial. The Prometheus approach, if validated, could potentially offer significantly improved energy efficiency and reduced environmental impact.

Scientific Skepticism and Validation Challenges

The scientific community maintains significant skepticism toward LENR-based hydrogen production for several reasons:

1. Theoretical Framework: There is no widely accepted theoretical model explaining how nuclear reactions could occur under the reported conditions.

2. Reproducibility: Historical challenges in consistently reproducing LENR effects have been a major barrier to scientific acceptance.

3. Measurement Challenges: Accurately measuring small amounts of excess heat and distinguishing nuclear from chemical processes requires sophisticated equipment and rigorous controls.

4. Historical Context: The field's controversial history and association with the discredited 1989 cold fusion claims continue to affect the perception of new developments.

The Prometheus team claims to have addressed these challenges through rigorous testing and third-party validation. While traditional scientific acceptance typically requires peer-reviewed publication and independent replication, today's technological landscape is evolving rapidly. With AI-assisted research and development, innovations are accelerating at unprecedented rates, often outpacing conventional validation processes. Many breakthrough technologies now bypass the lengthy peer review system, instead demonstrating commercial viability through real-world applications and market validation, a path that Prometheus appears to be following as it moves from laboratory testing to practical implementation.

Recent Developments in Prometheus LENR Technology

Latest Announcements and Progress

The Prometheus LENR reactor has seen significant developments in recent years, with 2025 marking what many industry observers consider a potential breakthrough year for the technology. According to the March 2025 LENR Forum Newsletter, the Kilometro Rosso science park in Italy has strengthened its partnership with venture builder Ground Control Holding to further develop the LENR-based Prometheus Reactor.

Salvatore Majorana, director of Kilometro Rosso and nephew of the famous Italian physicist Ettore Majorana, has been a prominent spokesperson for the project. In a recent interview with Il Corriere della Sera, he stated: "We have created a reactor capable of developing high-efficiency green energy. From a spark, which we can repeat and control, we will produce energy at the service of people and industry." He emphasized that the technology is not based on conventional electrolysis but rather on a unique LENR process.

The Prometheus project, which began in 2018, has been developed through close collaboration between Ground Control Holding, Kilometro Rosso, and academic institutions including the Polytechnic University of Milan and the University of Milano-Bicocca. After five years of development, the team has reported achieving significant milestones, with third-party validations confirming the reactor's stability and efficiency.

Industry Reception and Partnerships

The Prometheus reactor has garnered attention from various sectors, particularly the maritime industry. At the European Tugowners Association seminar, Ground Control Holding's Fabrizio Petrucci introduced the UM 3.0 Prometheus unit, highlighting its potential to power endothermic engines for both land and sea applications.

According to industry reports, Prometheus S.p.A. is an IP company with its main laboratories at the Kilometro Rosso innovation district in Lombardy, Italy. The company has raised funds from various international sources and has begun engaging with globally leading industrial firms capable of quickly bringing different versions of the UM reactors to market.

The February 2025 article from the Canadian Association for the Club of Rome identified Prometheus (Italy) among the leading innovators in the LENR field, alongside Clean Planet (Japan), the European Union's CleanHME program, Aureon Energy (Canada), and Hylenr (India). This recognition places Prometheus within a growing ecosystem of LENR technology developers worldwide.

Investment and Funding Updates

Prometheus S.p.A. is actively seeking additional funding to accelerate the reactor's commercialization. With a significant minority stake held by Alberto Bombassei, founder of Brembo, the project aims to raise approximately €7 million to support industrial prototyping and licensing efforts.

According to industry sources, the company is seeking approximately $10 million in investment to transition from prototype to practical applications, with plans to collaborate with manufacturers for large-scale production. This funding round is expected to support the company's goal of making the technology available for widespread adoption, leveraging Italy's manufacturing capabilities in electronics, precision mechanics, and high-resistance materials.

The broader LENR field is also seeing increased investment interest. A 2025 industry report suggests that as LENR technology matures, investment is likely to surge, potentially rivaling or even surpassing the recent AI investment boom, as energy needs are already baked in. This is attributed to the global energy market's enormous size and the technology's potential to address worldwide energy demands sustainably.

Technical Progress and Validation

The Prometheus team has reported significant technical progress with their UM series reactors. According to presentation materials from the European Tugowners Association, the UM 2.0 version has already been demonstrated through third-party tests to produce:

• Peak pressure is useful for exploiting kinetic energy

• Hydrogen with unprecedented efficiency

The company has stated that the UM produces hydrogen only when and where it is needed, eliminating the need for storage, pipelines, recharging, and mitigating explosion risks.

As of early 2025, the UM 3.0 reactor was scheduled for testing at TRL-4 (Technology Readiness Level 4) to demonstrate its capability to replace endothermic engines for various land and sea vehicles, as well as for electricity production.

Timeline and Commercialization Plans

According to Salvatore Majorana's statements in early 2025, the Prometheus reactor is expected to become operational in a relatively short timeframe: "We are counting on a year and a half, but it is already ready to be presented to investors." This suggests potential commercial availability by late 2026.

The company's strategy appears to focus on licensing and joint ventures in addition to research and development, to bring the technology to market as quickly as possible. The Prometheus team has expressed their belief that the technology will "usher in a new era of clean, reliable, portable and distributable energy for Europe and the world."

Industry analysts predict 2025 to be a pivotal year for LENR technology, with technological breakthroughs, increased investment, and growing research interest transitioning the field from niche research to practical commercial applications.

Applications and Implications of Prometheus LENR Technology

Maritime Applications

The maritime sector stands to benefit significantly from the Prometheus reactor technology. The shipping industry faces increasing pressure to reduce carbon emissions, with the International Maritime Organization (IMO) setting ambitious targets for decarbonization. Traditional marine propulsion systems rely heavily on fossil fuels, making the sector a significant contributor to global carbon emissions.

The Prometheus reactor's ability to generate kinetic energy and hydrogen using only seawater and electricity positions it as a potentially transformative solution for maritime applications. According to presentations at the European Tugowners Association seminar, the UM 3.0 Prometheus unit is being developed with capabilities to power endothermic engines specifically designed for marine vessels.

Key advantages for maritime applications include:

1. Fuel Source Availability: With seawater being the primary resource needed, vessels would have continuous access to their fuel source, potentially eliminating the need for frequent refueling stops.

2. Emissions Reduction: As the technology produces no carbon emissions during operation, it could help shipping companies meet increasingly stringent environmental regulations.

3. Compact Design: The reactor's reported compact size would be advantageous for space-constrained marine vessels, where maximizing cargo capacity is essential.

4. On-Demand Hydrogen Production: The ability to produce hydrogen as needed eliminates the challenges associated with hydrogen storage and transportation at sea, including safety concerns related to compressed or liquefied hydrogen.

Industry experts suggest that initial applications might focus on smaller vessels such as tugboats and coastal ferries before scaling to larger cargo ships and eventually cruise liners. The technology's development timeline aligns with the maritime industry's need for viable alternative propulsion systems to meet mid-term decarbonization targets.

Other Industrial Applications

Beyond maritime use, the Prometheus reactor technology has potential applications across multiple industrial sectors:

Energy Generation

The reactor's ability to produce mechanical work and heat could be harnessed for electricity generation. According to company materials, the technology could potentially be adapted for:

• Distributed Power Generation: Small-scale, localized power production for communities, businesses, or remote locations.

• Industrial Heat Applications: Providing process heat for manufacturing, which accounts for a significant portion of industrial energy consumption.

• Combined Heat and Power (CHP): Simultaneous generation of usable heat and electricity, increasing overall energy efficiency.

Transportation

The technology's potential extends to various transportation modes:

• Automotive Applications: Adaptation to power vehicles through either direct mechanical energy or by generating hydrogen for fuel cells.

• Rail Transport: Potential application in trains, particularly in regions without electrified rail infrastructure.

• Aviation: Long-term potential for hydrogen production to support hydrogen-powered aircraft development.

Hydrogen Production

The Prometheus reactor's reported ability to generate hydrogen efficiently could position it as a significant player in the emerging hydrogen economy:

• Green Hydrogen Production: Unlike conventional electrolysis, which requires substantial electrical input and high-purity water, the Prometheus system reportedly produces hydrogen using minimal electrical input and ordinary seawater.

• Decentralized Production: The compact nature of the technology could enable on-site hydrogen production for industrial users, reducing transportation and storage challenges.

• Fuel Cell Support: Providing hydrogen for fuel cells in various applications, from stationary power to transportation.

Environmental and Economic Implications

Environmental Impact

If the Prometheus technology performs as claimed, its environmental implications could be substantial:

• Carbon Reduction: A zero-emission energy source could significantly contribute to decarbonization efforts across multiple sectors.

• Resource Efficiency: Using seawater rather than freshwater resources addresses water scarcity concerns associated with some green hydrogen production methods.

• Reduced Mining Impact: Less reliance on rare earth elements and precious metals compared to some renewable energy technologies.

• Lifecycle Considerations: The environmental footprint would include manufacturing and eventual disposal of reactor components, though these impacts would likely be minimal compared to fossil fuel alternatives.

Economic Implications

The economic potential of the technology extends beyond the company itself:

• Energy Market Disruption: Successful commercialization could significantly impact traditional energy markets and potentially accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels.

• Job Creation: Manufacturing, installation, maintenance, and research roles could create new employment opportunities, particularly in regions with strong manufacturing capabilities like Italy.

• Energy Independence: Nations could reduce dependence on imported energy resources, improving energy security and reducing geopolitical vulnerabilities.

• Cost Structures: If the technology delivers on its efficiency promises, it could potentially lower energy costs across multiple sectors, with cascading economic benefits.

Regulatory and Policy Considerations

The emergence of LENR technology presents unique challenges for regulatory frameworks:

• Safety Standards: New safety protocols and standards would need to be developed specifically for LENR technologies.

• Certification Processes: Maritime and other applications would require certification from relevant authorities, potentially requiring updates to existing regulatory frameworks.

• Incentive Structures: Governments may need to consider how LENR technologies fit within existing clean energy incentive programs and carbon pricing mechanisms.

• International Coordination: Given the global nature of shipping and energy markets, international coordination on standards and regulations would be beneficial.

Future Outlook

The future development and adoption of Prometheus LENR technology will likely depend on several factors:

1. Technical Validation: Continued demonstration of the technology's performance, reliability, and safety under various operating conditions.

2. Scaling Production: Successfully transitioning from prototype to commercial-scale manufacturing while maintaining quality and performance.

3. Market Acceptance: Overcoming skepticism related to LENR's controversial history and building trust among potential customers and investors.

4. Competitive Landscape: Positioning relative to other emerging clean energy technologies, including conventional hydrogen production methods, advanced batteries, and other fusion approaches.

Industry analysts suggest that 2025-2026 will be critical years for determining whether Prometheus and similar LENR technologies can successfully transition from promising research to commercial reality. The company's reported timeline of operational readiness within 18 months (from early 2025) places potential commercial deployment around late 2026, though initial applications may be limited to specific use cases before broader adoption.

Summary of Findings

The Prometheus LENR reactor represents a potentially groundbreaking development in clean energy technology. Through our comprehensive research, we have traced its evolution from concept to near-commercial prototype, examined its scientific foundations, and explored its potential applications across multiple sectors.

The technology's core innovation lies in its reported ability to initiate Low Energy Nuclear Reactions using minimal electrical input and ordinary seawater, producing mechanical energy, heat, and hydrogen without combustion, radioactive materials, or traditional electrolysis. This approach stands in stark contrast to conventional hydrogen production methods, which typically require substantial energy input and often rely on fossil fuels.

Developed through collaboration between Ground Control Holding, Kilometro Rosso innovation district, and academic institutions including the Polytechnic University of Milan and the University of Milano-Bicocca, the Prometheus reactor has progressed through multiple iterations. The current UM 3.0 version is reportedly undergoing testing at Technology Readiness Level 4 to demonstrate its capability to replace endothermic engines for various applications.

Future Prospects

Looking ahead, several key developments will likely determine the trajectory of Prometheus LENR technology:

• Near-term Milestones: According to company statements, the Prometheus reactor is expected to become operational within approximately 18 months from early 2025, suggesting potential commercial availability by late 2026. Initial deployments will likely focus on specific applications before broader adoption.

• Investment Landscape: The company's current funding round, seeking approximately €7-10 million, will be critical for supporting the transition from prototype to commercial product. The success of this funding effort will provide insights into investor confidence in the technology.

• Industry Partnerships: Collaboration with established manufacturers will be essential for scaling production. The company's ability to secure and maintain these partnerships will significantly impact commercialization timelines.

• Broader LENR Field: Developments in the wider LENR ecosystem, including research from other companies and academic institutions, could provide additional validation or raise new questions about the underlying science.

Final Word

The Prometheus LENR reactor represents a bold attempt to harness controversial but potentially transformative science for practical energy applications. If successful, it could contribute significantly to decarbonization efforts across multiple sectors, particularly in maritime transport, where clean energy alternatives are limited.

However, the path from promising technology to widespread adoption is rarely straightforward. The coming years will be critical in determining whether Prometheus can overcome the scientific skepticism, technical challenges, and market barriers that have historically limited LENR technologies.

What remains clear is that the urgent need for clean, efficient energy solutions continues to drive innovation at the boundaries of established science. Whether the Prometheus reactor ultimately fulfills its ambitious promises or not, the pursuit itself contributes valuable knowledge to our collective search for sustainable energy futures.

As we monitor developments in this field, maintaining both open-minded curiosity and scientific standards will be essential, allowing us to embrace promising innovations while ensuring they meet the robust requirements necessary for addressing our global energy challenges.

References

1. Storms, E. (2012). "A Student's Guide to Cold Fusion." LENR-CANR.org.

2. Wikipedia. (2025). "Cold fusion." Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion

3. Fleischmann, M., & Pons, S. (1989). "Electrochemically induced nuclear fusion of deuterium." Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 261(2), 301-308.

4. U.S. Department of Energy. (2004). "Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions."

5. Prometheus Reactor. (2025). Official website. Retrieved from

   https://www.prometheusreactor.com/

6. Kilometro Rosso. (2025). "Prometheus." Retrieved from https://www.kilometrorosso.com/en/partner/prometheus-2/

7. E-Cat World. (2024). "Prometheus Project Announcement: LENR Reactor Produces Green Hydrogen (not by electrolysis)."

8. LENR Forum News March 2025 Newsletter. (2025, March 23). LENR News. Retrieved from https://lenr-news.com/lenr-forum-news-march-2025-newsletter/

9. Catalysed fusion & LENR poised for a breakout year in 2025. (2025, February 11). Canadian Association for the Club of Rome. Retrieved from https://canadiancor.com/breaking-news/catalysed-fusion-lenr-poised-for-a-breakout-year-in-2025/

10. Ground Control Holding. (2025). News. Retrieved from https://www.groundcontrolholding.com/news/

11. European Tugowners Association. (2023, November). Conference presentation. Retrieved from https://eurotugowners.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/fabrizio-eta-nov.pdf

12. International Maritime Organization. (2023). Strategy on the reduction of GHG emissions from ships.

~New Fire Energy Inc.

Disclaimer: This article by New Fire Energy is for informational and educational purposes only. It provides an overview of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) technology and the company Prometheus S.p.A. It is not intended as financial or investment advice. New Fire Energy is not affiliated with Prometheus S.p.A. and does not endorse or verify any of the company’s claims. All information, references, and materials cited in this article are sourced from publicly available data and may not be guaranteed accurate or complete

The video clip used herein is publicly available on the Prometheus website. New Fire Energy has no affiliation with Prometheus and does not endorse, represent, or sell its products. This content is presented for educational and informational purposes under the Fair Use Act.